I should add that with a shallower penetration there will be more time spent shuffling, and thus a lower expected loss on an hourly basis. Aside from that, the house edge is not affected by penetration. In the end, it averages out, for the basic strategy player.įor reasons I explain in my blackjack appendix 10, the basic strategy player should prefer a game with a continuous shuffler, if his goal is to minimize the house edge. However, if the count were negative then hitting would be all the better. Your edge against multi-deck games is generally less than 1. If the count were high, standing would be the right play, resulting in what would look like an error to a counter who was watching. but when you do you can surrender your initial hand when the dealer has a natural blackjack (21). Factor in the following changes: Double 11 vs. Let’s say the basic strategy player has 16 against a 10 late in the shoe, and hits. There are a few small adjustments that you may want to consider if you are playing a blackjack game where the dealer hits on soft 17. However, if that were true, then the odds would change if the dealer dealt the cards in reverse order. You seem to be suggesting that the cards are more clumpy at the end of the deck. Just because the count is zero at the top of the shoe doesn’t mean you’ll have an exact balance of high and low cards. Clumps of high or low cards are just as likely to appear at the beginning of the shoe, as the middle, as the end. In a non-cut-card game, the house advantage is always the same for the non-counter.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |